Online talk:Guardian Council

Deletion Proposed

One possible reason to keep this as a page (and the reason I created it) - Patch Notes refere to the trio AS a trio. So there would be a permanent redlink. Timeoin (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

There would not be a permanent redlink as the link would be removed. The name is nothing more than that so does not deserve a page. It isn't a faction, and it certainly isn't notable enough to merit anything more than mention on the relevant pages. Silence is Golden^{Break the Silence} 21:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

There are a lot of links to this page currently. Should they be unlinked? – Robin Hood  ^(talk) 04:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Personally, I say no. They are a "set", and achievements and patch notes refer to them as they are. Timeoin (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

This page, and others like it are pointless. They refer to a "concept" that has no need for an explanation, and when given is exactly as it is on the page, one short line that cannot be expanded upon without duplication of the three separate pages to which it links. The patch notes are no basis upon which to make a page, given their horrendous record of misspellings, typos, and plain wrong information, not to mention that they just don't need to link to every single possible thing mentioned. The little bits of actually useful information that they produce can simply be added to the existing pages without the need to make thousands of links that lead nowhere. If something is truly needed to remove confusion, a redirect to the place page bosses section would suffice, but given that in any case we would be sending people to another page to explain the "concept", the link in the achievements to the place page already does that. Silence is Golden^{Break the Silence} 21:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)