Oblivion talk:Nibenay Basin

The UESPWiki – Your source for The Elder Scrolls since 1995
Jump to: navigation, search

Regarding Undo Revision[edit]

Re: "09:40, 19 February 2008 HMSVictory (Talk | contribs) (5,611 bytes) (Undo revision 248647 by Laisren (Talk) There is no reason why this information should not be here.) "

I did not remove any information:

  • I removed the wording that said "Suprisingly..." because there is no reason that it should be "suprising" (see my comment on the page history).
  • I did a minor 'rearranging of the sentences. Please review the changes more closely to see how it was re-arranged. Thanks.
    - Laisren 04:20, 23 February 2008 (EST)
You removed nearly all of the information! I would have agreed with you had you just removed "surprisingly," but when I patrol your edit, nearly all of the article is gone! What where you thinking? The information here is adequete as it is, and needs no major revamping. --HMSVictory 04:56, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Victory, I'm not sure what you mean. All that Laisren did was move the text around a bit - nothing was deleted apart from the word "surprisingly". I originally put that word in because when I was mapping out the regions a few months back I was surprised at just how far east the basin went. I'm not sure I agree with Laisren's point about river basins because in the case most of the Great Forest and West Weald would be part of the basin too, but it was a purely personal reaction and thus doesn't belong on the article. –RpehTCE 10:03, 23 February 2008 (EST)
What? When I check over his edit, all I could see on the "Current Revison" section was green space! There was no information left save the short introductory paragraph. I assumed that Larisen had decided that the information was irrelevent, which, of course, it wasn't, and had deleted it all. So Larisen did a little more than "move the text around a bit" - he had removed most of the article's information! I can't see what was wrong with the information as it was, so I reverted the edit, guessing that what was there must be better than nothing at all! --HMSVictory 10:34, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Now look further down. He rephrased things a bit, that's all! [1]RpehTCE 11:50, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Oh crap... SORRY! --HMSVictory 14:04, 23 February 2008 (EST)
No worries, mate. Happens to the best of us :-) (That's all I was trying to say about the 'look more closely' part...) --Laisren 02:26, 24 February 2008 (EST)
I think I should stay away from the Recent Changes page for a while. --HMSVictory 10:06, 24 February 2008 (EST)

basin=lowlands[edit]

As the word is 'basin' the shaded area should not extend so far north, as it overlaps with the highlands around cheydinhal, where the rise of the land is dramatic. — Unsigned comment by Temple-Zero (talkcontribs)

The shaded area is what the game considers to be the basin regardless of any geographical accuracy. –RpehTCE 09:50, 27 July 2008 (EDT)